• Mike Shymkowich Kennedy

Where Did COVID-19 Really Come From?


Hello friends,


You're clever enough to dismiss the various mainstream claims of the origin of COVID-19, and wonder to yourself where it actually came from. Well, here it is!


Let's dig into this by first investigating findings from Dr. David E. Martin, the founding Chairman of Mosaic Technologies and the patent regulatory organization, M-CAM.


This U.S.-based company worked with finding civilian applications for technologies developed in military applications around the world; most prominently countries that were prohibited from exporting offensive military technologies as conditions of the treaties that ended the second World War.


Dr. Martin and his team built up the Mosaic organization. From breast cancer to stealth materials and from antenna to every device that you probably have in your hand or in your laptop, the company had a very important role to play during the 1990s. It successfully brought technologies out of bio-weapons and weapons laboratories and getting them into civilian and commercial use.


In 1998, Dr. Martin decided it was necessary to establish a regulatory body that would be used to regulate patents and facilitate their use as bankable collateral such that mall business could have a leg to stand on. Thus, M-CAM was formed.


The formation of M-CAM led to the first audit of patent systems in Canada, the USA, Australia, the European Union, and elsewhere. In this audit, the group found an enormous number of crimes were committed using the patent system to stand in the way of progress not to advance innovations for which they were established.


Specifically in 1999, audits uncovered what became the roots of our awareness of the current pandemic; they uncovered the biologic materials in violation of the biological and chemical weapons treaties that were proliferating around the country and around the world.


And in 1999 going into 2000, M-CAM first reported on the weaponization of biologic materials in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties. And among those weaponizations was, in M-CAM's first published report for a number of intelligence and law enforcement community, the identification of the chimeric alteration and recombinant technologies around coronavirus, which in 1999 were first developed to serve as a means by which we could build a vaccine vector; at the time thought to be useful for the treatment or prevention of HIV.


The problem with that work was that in 1999—with NIAID’S funding directed by Anthony Fauci— it became very clear that what they had done in their gain-of-function research in 1999 was take what was a normally occurring pathogen and turn it into what was then referred to as ‘an infectious, non-transmissible pathogen’.


In other words they actually made it more dangerous to humans and they did so such that it could be used as a potential for vaccine vectors going forward. And that was in 1999.


In 2002, the weaponization of corona virus was ready. That’s when the spike protein, the ACE receptor dynamics, and the open reading frames around various sub-fractions of the protein synthesis were completed. Note that we did not have SARS as a human condition until we had invented a weaponized version of coronavirus.


A decade earlier, Pfizer had filed the first patent on a coronavirus vaccine, which was a veterinary application—and that was filed in 1990. Let me say that again: Pfizer’s first effort to get a spike protein based vaccine for corona virus started in 1990, not in 2020.


This has been, to restate the obvious, a pathogen bio-weapons program that is now over two decades in the making. And it is vital for us to understand that what is currently being called the medical countermeasure—referred to as a vaccine—does not meet the statutory definition of that particular technology because, unlike every other vaccine in the history of humanity, every other vaccine is derived from some fragment or attenuated version of a pathogen.


This particular injection that we’re dealing with right now is an mRNA model computer generated—not derived from a living or an organic material.


This is a computer simulation of an mRNA strand which was thought to be a means by which we could turn the human body into a pathogen creator. By that I mean the formation of the coronavirus associated spike protein.



And, for the first time in vaccine history, this is not in fact a vaccine. It’s gene therapy to create a bio-weapon. For the first time, we are relying on the immune system to respond to a pathogen creation that we first inject into people.


The fact is that we have an unprecedented outcome. And if we go back and look at patent and laboratory records and if we go back and look at the funding records, we see that the current pathogen called SARS-COV-2 was clearly chimerically altered and was primarily developed in the laboratory so that it could be used both as a weapon and as a medical countermeasure in 2015.


There is no novel coronavirus. In actuality, there is a weaponized version of a computer simulation of a fragment that is in fact modeled to be the spike protein, analogous to what we’ve been told is the spike protein associated with SARS-COV-2.


The problem is we do not have anything that is actually derived from an actual pathogen. And we do not have anything that’s actually responsive to the immune system that was in fact responsive to a pathogen. This is a computer simulation meant to harm and destroy what we call humanity.


According to Pfizer, we currently have what they refer to in their own documents as, ‘an acceptable death rate’.


I don’t know how many of you can sit with that statement, but the notion that there is something called ‘an acceptable death rate’ is something I find morally repugnant.


What I find more interesting than that is Canada’s role in this, which has achieved almost no fundamental coverage in any media or even in the counter-culture media. Most Canadians don’t realize that Canada and specifically the University of British Columbia (UBC), beginning in 2005 realized that if it was going to be relevant in the biotech space, it had to be the research hotbed for establishing the delivery mechanism, whereby mRNA vaccines could be developed.


Prime Minister Trudeau's Involvement


The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.


I think most people would be shocked to find out that when you have the Prime Minister of Canada getting up in front of a camera in spring of 2020 telling the world that the only way forward to allegedly return to a new normal is when there is a vaccine. What Trudeau did not tell the public was that he had a financial stake in the outcome of that being the selected pathway forward.


To shorten this article, I will simply quote the headlines from this article:


“Trudeau's statements biased the marketplace against the consumer.”


Racketeering and antitrust laws have been violated. No corporation should receive civil liability immunity if they are complicit in a felony crime and Canadians need to understand that they have been duped. The Government of Canada is complicit in violating biological and chemical weapon laws, and that falls to the Prime Minister.


As Peter Daszak has stated, “We need the public to accept a medical countermeasure for a pan-coronavirus vaccine; we need the media to create the hype and we need to use the hype to our advantage. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of a process."


Peter Daszak has been proven in having a key role in laundering NIAID (Director – Anthony Fauci) funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.


It sounds like a conspiracy because it is a criminal conspiracy, a racketeering conspiracy meant to harm and destroy human life; they told us it was a vaccine because they wanted the shield over immunity of liability. This is not about masks. This is not about social distancing. Those were the decoys to distract us from the crimes being committed.


The crimes that are being committed are racketeering, the deployment of bioweapons, and reckless homicide, if not willful murder of massive numbers of our population. And we cannot sit idly by and allow that to persist


Stay strong my friends. We are in a critical time and must continue to seek out the truth and protect ourselves accordingly.

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All